Hopes for the Future

yes I am

I love the fourth wall... Its held togetherwith sellotape and spit.

oh and about that kat + art thing. Jack drew something in the sketchbook a while back i don't have a link but it had kat hugging art from behind and art says"are you purring?" kat:"maybe" with a smile

stephanodude wrote:oh and about that kat + art thing. Jack drew something in the sketchbook a while back i don't have a link but it had kat hugging art from behind and art says"are you purring?" kat:"maybe" with a smile

Pics or it didn't happen.

Like THIS?!

http://jollyjack.deviantart.com/art/Are-you-purring-114642944

stephanodude wrote:Like THIS?!

http://jollyjack.deviantart.com/art/Are-you-purring-114642944

zOMGzorz!

I told you it happened

On unrelated note: as we know that Vanity is real psychic and therefore can really see auras, than this strip has a lot of promise.

It's kinda funny, yet tiring how the Art and Kat debate always comes up.

I remember JJ saying that Art and Kat will probably never hook up, but there will be plenty of humorous sexual tension between the two of them.

Like the pumpkin gag... Heh heh

Lazarus Firenze wrote:I love the fourth wall... Its held togetherwith sellotape and spit.

I always thought that the fourth wall was held together with duct tape, several wades of used gum, and a single strand of dental floss.

Anyways, I agree with Zorpheus that this comic has great potential. Now, you know why Sequential Art is one of my homepage tabs!

I did this when JJ did a filler strip.
I just added and changed dialog.

Can you upload the original?

Can't find it. Must be on my SA flashdrive.

Zorpheus wrote: Possible explanation as to why there are humans and animal people mixed in the SA world. Some comics make it seem common (Vanity being a successful author, other background characters distinctly shown with animal traits), while others seem to make it seem like seeing or hearing about animal girls is unusual as detailed in comics like these. Though there might not actually be a story reason for this, but if there is one... yeah.

lol a few days ago i asked jj this exact question his reply didnt tell me much
jj:"The explanation is; because." which just frustrated me

There always must be fans' f'ustration for artists' freedom of fantasy.

Brrr... I can see, that "95%" of the fresest gags can be found on this forum... ew.
I feel like spoiled.

--------

It does mean, that nearly all gags and jokes are from forum and it makes me feel bored.

Um... can I get a translation of that please?

Retsof wrote:Um... can I get a translation of that please?

Probably commenting about the number of jokes that have pooped up since the whole Kat and Hilary dream makeout, and the Vanity and Kat panel jokes we've been putting up.

neokiva wrote:jj:"The explanation is; because." which just frustrated me

Shades of Takahashi Rumiko at a Con...

"fan" : What would happen if Ranma got pregnant as a girl, and then changed back to a boy?
Takahashi : I don't think about that, and neither should you.

Anthrax_0 wrote:

The ol' good paper dictionary says: "Furry - something, covered with fur".

Factually, it is really hard to make a border (and the SA is an example of impossibily of this inside one comic) , so there is a "collecting noun".
(I don't care the additional means.)


And the only hope - MOAR!!! More strips, good and different ones!

EmfinnFZ wrote:

neokiva wrote:jj:"The explanation is; because." which just frustrated me

Shades of Takahashi Rumiko at a Con...

"fan" : What would happen if Ranma got pregnant as a girl, and then changed back to a boy?
Takahashi : I don't think about that, and neither should you.

lol i loved ranma 1/2 although telling his fan that he shouldnt think that,is cruel especially if the fan is an artist or writer themselves. thinking up fun and crazy stuff is the artist and writers job take pablo piccaso for example he got bored with normal human portraits and started the cubism movement (i still say cubism is freaky), that was waaaayy outside the box lol . but dont ever do a van guoh tho cause thats just extreme.(chopping of his ear)

Quoth neokiva:
but dont ever do a van guoh tho cause thats just extreme.(chopping of his ear)

Technically, van Gogh didn't chop off his ear. He only cut off part of his earlobe.

CyberCorn Entropic wrote:

Quoth neokiva:
but dont ever do a van guoh tho cause thats just extreme.(chopping of his ear)

Technically, van Gogh didn't chop off his ear. He only cut off part of his earlobe.

same thing and still extreme