Cracked Perpetual Motion? With a Slanky?!

26_994 wrote:Well, I could use car accumulator and a couple of wires for collecting the energy (or, maybe, i just could plug it with standard power cord and 0,5 V (ferrum charge) -> 220 V voltage transforer).

But if it went wrong wouldn't it just send more energy into the slanky, making it 'splode faster?

I have nothing to say about fixing the situation, but running like hell would be the best thing to do now, maybe jump on a plane and fly to china as you watch your town be 'sploded by a friggin SLANKY.

Zjonni wrote:Cavorite! Outstanding. But will it go through a complete Wellsian transmogrification before exploding?

I dunno, Verne.

Depends on the Julian Date(Jules Vern).

Mmm... I dare say the puns be gettin' pirty thick...

Grandia wrote:

26_994 wrote:Well, I could use car accumulator and a couple of wires for collecting the energy (or, maybe, i just could plug it with standard power cord and 0,5 V (ferrum charge) -> 220 V voltage transforer).

But if it went wrong wouldn't it just send more energy into the slanky, making it 'splode faster?

I have nothing to say about fixing the situation, but running like hell would be the best thing to do now, maybe jump on a plane and fly to china as you watch your town be 'sploded by a friggin SLANKY.

Well, I was thinking about creating a power plant or a power source for some time machines... damn, KAT! TRY TO REQUEST A TIME MACHINE !!!

Ummm...You really want the Fearsome Foursome meddling with time travel??!! Gah!!!

Well, maybe "interuniverse travel", if you want. I guess I could handle such a nicies.

Frankly, based on past evidence, it is literally lethally unwise to allow the Quads to mokey with (or squirrel with, if you prefer) any device more complicated and with more engineering 'loose ends' than, say, a propelling pencil. I suspect even that would be 'iffy'.

Shognu37 wrote:Ummm...You really want the Fearsome Foursome meddling with time travel??!! Gah!!!

Yes! More than you can possibly imagine, yes.

26_994 wrote:Well, maybe "interuniverse travel", if you want. I guess I could handle such a nicies.

"Number of the Beast" with the quads replacing Robert H's multiple (ever-so-preachy) self-inserts? What could possibly be better?

Read the book when I was younger. Still have a copy somewhere. Would be really interesting to see JJ's take.

LOVE IT!!! i really love when the girls do some experiments...where could that slanky explode?? i hope no one will get hurt EXEPT PIP!!! ahahaha

EmfinnFZ wrote:

Shognu37 wrote:Ummm...You really want the Fearsome Foursome meddling with time travel??!! Gah!!!

Yes! More than you can possibly imagine, yes.

I'm all for Kat and Art's son or daughter arriving with a warning from the future.
(Packed, taped, stamped, and shipped.)

EmfinnFZ wrote:

Shognu37 wrote:Ummm...You really want the Fearsome Foursome meddling with time travel??!! Gah!!!

Yes! More than you can possibly imagine, yes.

Nothing good will come from this.

Shognu37 wrote:

EmfinnFZ wrote:

Shognu37 wrote:Ummm...You really want the Fearsome Foursome meddling with time travel??!! Gah!!!

Yes! More than you can possibly imagine, yes.

Nothing good will come from this.

The universe as it stands is (if rounded off after 10 significant decimal places) 100% hostile to all life. How could one that comes into being under the guidance of The Quads not be an improvement?

OOOOhhh, let's see. A -known- hostile universe vs. a universe that may explode or act very, very strange at any time. Problem!!!???

@ Shognu37

I'll stick with this universe over anything created by the Quads. At least something vaguely resembling logic as well as the laws of cause and effect reign here!

Shogun37 wrote:OOOOhhh, let's see. A -known- hostile universe vs. a universe that may explode or act very, very strange at any time. Problem!!!???

BenRG wrote:
I'll stick with this universe over anything created by the Quads. At least something vaguely resembling logic as well as the laws of cause and effect reign here!

Pfft. You boring pro-logic bigots... Nothing but a lot of rationalists!

Yup. And smug with it, too.