Here you go.

jollyjack wrote:It's not required that all female characters lez-up at some point.

No laws of nature are actually "required" as such. They simply describe the reality, not enforce it.

("She fell!")

swordfish wrote:Thats hilarious, I guess there is an original of that?

The base is on JJ's deviantArt here. Kat's head and tail are from two other sketches, vanity's head is from the comic, and her tail I had to draw myself.

cenaris wrote:Sir, you tease us so with confirmation of such risqué material. Why must you tease us and keep it hidden?

Well, maybe someone else knows where to find it.

willdye wrote:

Black Mantha wrote:Will this do?

I don't think that JJ minds in this case, but please remove copyright watermarks when doing a mash-up (er, unless you're Jolly Jack posting under a pseudonym). Besides keeping lawyers and accountants happy, it helps assign credit/blame to the rightful target.

Altered or not, it's still JJ's work, and he still has copyright over the pieces. I could add a line clarifying it's a mash-up.

Mr. Jackson, what do you say?

Black Mantha wrote:Will this do?

Hahaha, that's awesome.

Jolly Jack wrote:It's not required that all female characters lez-up at some point. ......though, i may have already drawn that.....*special files*.....

::cough:: IthoughtthatonewasmoreBi. ::cough cough::

jollyjack wrote:It's not required that all female characters lez-up at some point.

......though, i may have already drawn that.....*special files*.....

Then don't be suprised when you'll come home and all of your internal/external digital memory modules will dissapear, along with drawn on paper sketches.

Guys, c'mon, we've gotta a job to be done.

Needs moar lesbian. Or at least bisexuality, srsly.

Damien Darkside wrote:Needs moar lesbian. Or at least bisexuality, srsly.

That hallucination is likely the most girl-on-girl you'll see in Sequential Art.

Unless Jack decides to go down the road of Josh L... That latest Girlly update borderlines on hardcore lesbian porn.